Case Analysis

Nirmal Singh Khalon v. State of Punjab

The court in this case discusses whether the high court has the power to handover the investigation to CBI or whether reinvestigation and second FIR are maintainable in the case with the relevant provisions.

Read Article »

Dark Horse Portfolio Investment Limited (2018) SCC OnLine NCLT 298

The court discusses section 14 of Companies Act, 2013, allows alterations to be made to the articles of the company which will allow a Company to convert from a Public Company to Private Company and vice versa, the section is conditional on the approval from the concerned Tribunal regarding such conversion of status of the company from a “Public” to a “Private” Company.

Read Article »

DalcoEngg. (P) LTD. v. Satish Prabhakar Padhye, 2010 4 SCC 378

In this case, two cases were presented at the Supreme Court of India where the explanation sought was similar by both the cases. The parties to the respective suits sought the meaning and co-relation of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, with certain relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956.

Read Article »

Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. v. Union of India

The case relates to the landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India that decriminalizes all consensual sex among adults that includes homosexual sex as well. In this article, we will be critically analyzing this case and the decriminalizing of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

Read Article »

L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India [AIR 1997 SC 1125]

The judgement has proved to be highly important in understanding the value of tribunals in the current judicial system of India. Tribunals have been termed as quasi-judicial bodies that help in expediting a mater and disposing of it in the given period.

Read Article »

Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India

The court in this case discusses that reasonableness and proportionality of a restriction is determined from the view point of the interest of the general public at large, and not from the point of view of the person upon whom the restrictions are imposed.

Read Article »

Zigomanis v. 2156775 Ontario Inc. (D’angelo Brands)

By way of this case, a celebrity’s endorsement contract was cancelled solely because of his nude photo scandal. The private life of a celebrity must not affect the contracts entered into by him in his professional capacity, if he is honouring the contracts as per the agreed terms.

Read Article »

Zee Telefilms & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

After BCCI cancelled telecasting rights of Zee Telefilms and the latter filed a writ petition, a question arose regarding maintainability of the petition. On reading this case analysis you will learn that it was held that the petition was not maintainable since BCCI was not covered by Article 12.

Read Article »